BABYFORECAST · GOOD TO KNOW
Sources, editorial responsibility and review status
You should be able to see where a statement comes from—and what has not been reviewed. A source link or passing software test is not medical approval.
Who is responsible?
Editorial content and product: Babyforecast. Operator: Wolf Wittmund. Full operator and contact details are in the legal notice. No named clinician review is documented for these explanations, and none is claimed.
How is health content handled?
Tips and myth checks identify their sources. The preview includes editorial drafts. Only explicitly approved contributions are intended for actual email delivery. Sources, check dates and documented qualified approval must cover the whole contribution and the language versions used. AI-assisted writing also requires qualified review.
What does a review date mean?
A source-check date records research, not automatically clinical review. A modification date records a text change. The original library records a source check on 17 September 2026; this page's date does not replace it. The Babyforecast model has not undergone independent clinical validation.
What about other languages?
The website offers 13 languages. The eleven translations added alongside German and English are drafts and need native-language and medical/legal review before public launch. These methodology and editorial pages are currently available in German and English.
What about calendar facts?
Cultural calendar facts are reviewed separately. Their sources support statements about people or events. They are not evidence for the prediction model and do not make one birthday medically better than another.
How can I report a correction?
Write to wolfwittmund@googlemail.com with the public page, the statement and, where possible, a source. Do not include pregnancy, account or guest information. Corrections should remain traceable; we do not change results to make them look more convincing.